Ir al menú de navegación principal Ir al contenido principal Ir al pie de página del sitio

Calidad durante el almacenamiento de huevos de gallinas alimentadas con dietas con aceite de palma

Egg quality during storage of eggs from hens fed diets with crude palm oil



Cómo citar
Ronald, Jose, & Luis. (2019). Calidad durante el almacenamiento de huevos de gallinas alimentadas con dietas con aceite de palma. Revista MVZ Córdoba, 24(3), 7297-7304. https://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.1244

Dimensions
PlumX

,

Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán (UADY), Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Km 15.5 carr. Mérida - Xmatkuil, Mérida, Yucatán, México.


,

Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán (UADY), Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Km 15.5 carr. Mérida - Xmatkuil, Mérida, Yucatán, México.


,

Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán (UADY), Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Km 15.5 carr. Mérida - Xmatkuil, Mérida, Yucatán, México.


Objetivo. Evaluar el efecto del aceite crudo de palma (ACP) sobre la calidad del huevo almacenado por varios días a diferentes temperaturas. Materiales y métodos. Un total de 240 gallinas de 28 semanas se alimentaron con dietas con 30g/kg de aceite de soya (AS) o ACP. Después de 12 semanas, muestras de huevos se almacenaron durante 0, 4, 8 y 12 días a 4, 12 y 24°C. Las características de calidad del huevo fueron evaluadas. Resultados. El huevo y la albúmina de gallinas en la dieta con ACP fueron más pesados que aquellos en la dieta con AS (p<0.05). La alta temperatura de almacenamiento redujo el peso del huevo, albúmina y yema, unidades Haugh (UH), altura de la albúmina y la yema, pH y color (p<0.05), pero aumentó el ancho de la albúmina y la yema, y la longitud de la albúmina (p<0.05). A medida que aumentaba el tiempo de almacenamiento, el peso del huevo, el peso y la altura de la albúmina, y la altura de la yema, el pH y el color se redujeron (p<0.05). Sin embargo, el peso y el ancho de la yema, el ancho y la longitud de la albúmina aumentaron (p<0.05). Conclusiones. Las gallinas en la dieta con ACP tuvieron huevos y albuminas más pesadas que las de las de la adieta con AS.  


Visitas del artículo 1559 | Visitas PDF


Descargas

Los datos de descarga todavía no están disponibles.
  1. Eke MO, Olaitan NI, Ochefu JH. Effect of storage conditions on the quality attributes of shell (table) eggs. Nig Food J. 2013; 31(2):18-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0189-7241(15)30072-2
  2. Yu-Chi L, Ter-Hsin C, Ying-Chen W, Yi-Chain L, Fa-Jui T. Effects of egg washing and storage temperature on the quality of eggshell cuticle and eggs. Food Chem. 2016; 211:687–693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.05.056
  3. Shin D, Narciso-Gaytán C, Regenstein JM, Sánchez-Plata MX. Effect of various refrigeration temperatures on quality of shell eggs. J Sci Food Agric. 2012; 92(7):1341–1345. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.4699
  4. Sert D, Aygun A, Demir MK. Effects of ultrasonic treatment and storage temperature on egg quality. Poult Sci. 2011; 90(4):869–875. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2010-00799
  5. Jones DR, Ward GE, Regmi P, Karcher DM. Impact of egg handling and conditions during extended storage on egg quality. Poul Sci. 2018; 97(2):716–723. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex351
  6. Quan TH, Benjakul S. Quality, protease inhibitor and gelling property of duck egg albumen as affected by storage conditions. J Food Sci Technol. 2018; 55(2):513­522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-017-2960-6
  7. Cherian G, Traber MG, Goeger MP, Leonard SW. Conjugated linoleic acid and fish oil in laying hen diets: effects on egg fatty acids, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances, and tocopherols during storage. Poult Sci. 2007; 86(5):953­958. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/86.5.953
  8. Botsoglou E, Govaris A, Fletouris D, Iliadis S. Olive leaves (Olea europea L.) and α­tocopheryl acetate as feed antioxidants for improving the oxidative stability of α­linolenic acid­ enriched eggs. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2013; 97(4):740­753. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0396.2012.01316.x
  9. Prada F, Ayala-Diaz IM, Delgado W, Ruiz-Romero R, Romero HM. Effect of fruit ripening on content and chemical composition of oil from three oil palm cultivars (Elaeis guineensis jacq.) grown in colombia. J Agric Food Chem. 2011; 59(18):10136–10142. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf201999d
  10. Njoku PC, Nwazota AOU. Effect of dietary inclusion of ascorbic acid and palm oil on the performance of laying hens in a hot tropical environment. Br Poult Sci. 1989; 30(4):831-840. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668908417209 .
  11. Choo YM, Ma AN, Chuah CH, Khor HT, Bong SC. A developmental study on the appearance of tocopherols and tocotrienols in developing palm mesocarp (Elaeis guineensis). Lipids. 2004; 39(6):561­564. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15554155
  12. Ali SF, Woodman OL. Tocotrienol Rich Palm Oil Extract Is More Effective Than Pure Tocotrienols at Improving Endothelium-Dependent Relaxation in the Presence of Oxidative Stress Oxidative. Medicine and Cellular Longevity 2015; 2015:150829. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/150829
  13. Irías-Mata A, Stuetz W, Sus N, Hammann S, Gralla K, Cordero-Solano A, Vetter W, Frank J. Tocopherols, tocomonoenols, and tocotrienols in oils of costa rican palm fruits: a comparison between six varieties and chemical versus mechanical extraction. J Agric Food Chem. 2017; 65(34):7476-7482. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.7b02230
  14. Ramanathan N, Tan E, Loh LJ, Seng Soh B, Ney Yap W. Tocotrienol is a cardioprotective agent against ageing-associated cardiovascular disease and its associated morbidities. Nutr Metab (Lond). 2018; 15:6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12986-018-0244-4 .
  15. Santiago-Rostagno H. Tablas brasileñas para aves y cerdos, composicion de alimentos y requerimientos nutricionales. 3era edición. Universidad Federal de Viçosa; Viçosa, Brasil: 2011. http://www.lisina.com.br/arquivos/Geral%20Espa%C3%B1ol.pdf
  16. SAS. SAS / STAT Version 9.3. 4th ed. Cary: SAS Institute; 2010.
  17. Kehui O, Wenjun W, Mingshen X, Yan J, Xinchen S. Effects of Different Oils on the Production Performances and Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids and Cholesterol Level of Yolk in Hens. Asian-Aust J Anim. Sci. 2004; 17(6):843-847. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2004.843
  18. Murugesan GR, Kerr BJ, Persia ME. Energy content of select dietary supplemental lipids for broilers, turkeys, and laying hen. J Appl Poult Res. 2017; 26(4):536–547. https://doi.org/10.3382/japr/pfx027
  19. Khatun J, Loh TC, Akit H, Foo HL, Mohamad R. Fatty acid composition, fat deposition, lipogenic gene expression and performance of broiler fed diet supplemented with different sources of oil. Anim Sci J. 2017; 88(9):1406–1413. https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.12775
  20. Ragni L, Al-Shami A, Mikhaylenko G, Tang J. Dielectric characterization of hen eggs during storage. J Food Eng. 2007; 82(4):450–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2007.02.063
  21. Gómez-de-Travecedo P, Caravaca FP, González-Redondo P. Effects of storage temperature and length of the storage period on hatchability and performance of red-legged partridge (Alectoris rufa) eggs. Poult Sci. 2014; 93(3):747–754. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2013-03329
  22. Suresh PV, Raj KR, Nidheesh T, Pal GK, Sakhare PZ. Application of chitosan for improvement of quality and shelf life of table eggs under tropical room conditions. J Food Sci Technol. 2015; 52(10):6345–6354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-015-1721-7
  23. Caner C, Yüceer M. Efficacy of various protein-based coating on enhancing the shelf life of fresh eggs during storage. Poult Sci. 2015; 94(7):1665–1677. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pev102
  24. Silversides FG, Scott TA. Effect of storage and layer age on quality of eggs from two lines of hens. Poult Sci. 2001; 80(8):1240­245. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/80.8.1240
  25. Jones DR, Karcher DM, Abdo Z. Effect of a commercial housing system on egg quality during extended storage. Poult Sci. 2014; 93(5):1282–1288. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2013-03631
  26. Jones DR, Musgrove MT. Effects of extended storage on egg quality factors. Poult Sci. 2005; 84(11):1774–1777. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/84.11.1774
  27. Biladeau AM, Keener KM. The effects of edible coatings on chicken egg quality under refrigerated storage. Poult Sci. 2009; 88(6):1266–1274. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00295
  28. Günhan S, Kirikçi K. Effects of different storage time on hatching results and some egg quality characteristics of rock partridge (A. graeca) (management and production). Poult Sci. 2017; 96(6):1628­1634. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pew443
  29. Nongtaodum S, Jangchud A, Jangchud K, Dhamvithee P, No HK, Prinyawiwatkul W. Oil coating affects internal quality and sensory acceptance of selected attributes of raw eggs during storage. J Food Sci. 2013; 78(2) S329-S335. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.12035
  30. Jin YH, Lee KT, Lee WI, Han YK. Effects of storage temperature and time on the quality of eggs from laying hens at peak production. Asian-Aust J Anim Sci. 2011; 24(2):279–284. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2011.10210
  31. Torrico DD, No HK, Prinyawiwatkul W, Janes M, Corredor JAH, Osorio L.F. Mineral oil–chitosan emulsion coatings affect quality and shelf-life of coated eggs during refrigerated and room temperature storage. J Food Sci. 2011; 76(4):s262-s268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2011.02125.x

Sistema OJS 3.4.0.3 - Metabiblioteca |