Anestro posparto en ganado bovino en el trópico

Anestro posparto en ganado bovino en el trópico

Publicado 2009-09-01

Abrir | Descargar
PDF FLIP
Cómo citar
Báez, G., & Grajales, H. (2009). Anestro posparto en ganado bovino en el trópico. Revista MVZ Córdoba, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.347
doi

https://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.347
Dimensions
PlumX
Giovanni Báez
Henry Grajales
Mostrar biografía de los autores
La productividad y rentabilidad de las empresas ganaderas depende en gran medida de la capacidad fisiológica de las hembras para cumplir con el objetivo de tener una cría por año. Un factor determinante para lograrlo es reducir al máximo el periodo de anestro posparto, que es el tiempo luego del parto durante el cual no existen suficientes niveles pulsátiles de hormona luteinizante (LH) que permitan un desarrollo final del folículo y la consiguiente ovulación. Dos factores intervienen principalmente en este fenómeno: la nutrición y el amamantamiento. Existen señales metabólicas que indican al eje hipotálamo-hipófisis que se ha alcanzado un equilibrio en el balance energético para que este inicie la secreción de hormona liberadora de gonadotropinas (GnRH) y se inicie el restablecimiento de la actividad reproductiva. Por su parte, el estimulo que ejerce el ternero sobre la vaca genera secreción de endorfinas endógenas a nivel hipotalámico que también van a inhibir la liberación de GnRH. Otros factores que modulan los efectos de la nutrición y el amamantamiento son la edad, numero de partos, raza, estrés calórico y factores sociales (efecto macho y hembra). Generalmente, luego de la primera ovulación, se presenta un ciclo estral de corta duración que corresponde a una luteolisis temprana en respuesta a la prostaglandina F2 alfa (PGF2α) de origen uterino; sin embargo, los niveles de progesterona producidos durante este corto periodo ejercen un importante papel en el establecimiento de la ciclicidad subsecuente.

Visitas del artículo 4663 | Visitas PDF

Descargas

Los datos de descarga todavía no están disponibles.
  1. Kanuya NL, Matiko MK, Nkya R, Bittegeko SBP, Mgasa MN, Reksen O et al. Seasonal changes in nutritional status and reproductive performance of Zebu cows kept under a traditional agro-pastoral system in Tanzania. Trop Anim Health Prod 2006; 38:511–519. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11250-006-4419-z
  3. Montiel F, Ahuja C, Body condition and suckling as factors influencing the duration of postpartum anestrous in cattle: a review. Anim Reprod Sci 2005; 85: 1-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2003.11.001
  5. Duffy P, Crowe MA, Boland MP, Roche JF. Effect of exogenous LH pulses on the fate of the first dominant follicle in postpartum beef cows nursing calves. J Reprod Fertil 2000; 118:9–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.1180009
  6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/reprod/118.1.9
  8. Nett TM, Cermak D, Braden T, Manns J, Niswender G. Pituitary receptors for GnRH and estradiol and pituitary content of gonadotropins in beef cows. II. Changes during the postpartum period. Domest Anim Endocrinol 1988; 5:81–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0739-7240(88)90029-X
  10. Wettemann RP, Lents CA, Ciccioli NH, White, FJ, Rubio I. Nutritionaland suckling-mediated anovulation in beef cows J Anim Sci 2003; 81(Sup 2):E48–E59.
  12. Short RE, Bellow RA, Staigmiller RB, Berardinelli JG, Custer EE. Physiological mechanisms controlling anestrous and fertility in postpartum beef cattle. J Anim Sci 1990; 68: 799-816. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/1990.683799x
  14. Jolly PD, McDougall S, Fitzpatrick LA, Macmillan KL , En twis tle KW. Physiological effects of undernutrition on postpartum anoestrus in cows. J Reprod Fert 1995; 49 (Suppl.): 477–492.
  16. Canfield RW, Butler WR. Energy balance, first ovulation and the effects of naloxone on LH secretion in early postpartum dairy cows. J Anim Sci 1991; 69: 740–746. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/1991.692740x
  18. Zurek E, Foxcroft OR, Kennelly JJ. Metabolic status and interval to first ovulation in postpartum dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 1995; 78: 1909–1920. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(95)76816-3
  20. Báez GM, Grajales HA, Pérez JE. Caracterización del ciclo estral mediante perfiles de esteroides (progesterona, 17 â-estradiol) en la raza Coste-o con cuernos (Bos taurus) en el trópico Colombiano. Livestock Research for Rural Development 2007; Volume 19, Article #132. Acceso marzo 31, 2009, disponible en http://www.cipav.org.co/ lrrd/lrrd19/9/baez19132.htm
  22. Galina CS, Arthur GH. Review of cattle reproduction in the tropics. 3. Puerperium. Anim Breed Abstr 1989; 57: 889–910.
  24. Villa-Godoy A, Hughes, TL, Emery RS, Chapin LT, Fogwell RL. Association between energy balance and luteal function in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 1988; 71: 1063–1072. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(88)79653-8
  26. Arias P, Rodriguez M, Szwarcfarb B, Sinay IR, Moguilevsky JA. Effect of insulin on LHRH release by perifused hypothalamic fragments. Neuroendocrinology 1992; 56:415–418. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000126257
  28. Spicer LJ, Echternkamp SE. The ovarian insulin and insulin-like growth factor system with an emphasis on domestic animals. Domest Anim Endocrinol 1995; 12: 223–245. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0739-7240(95)00021-6
  30. Constant F, Ponter AA, Ponsart C, Fontaine JJ, Mialot JP, Grimard B et al.. Effect of underfeeding on plasmatic and intrafollicular IGFBPs in postpartum anoestrus beef cows. J Reprod Fertil Abstr Ser 2000; 26:15.
  32. Richards MW, Wettemann RP, Spicer LJ, Morgan GL. Nutritional anestrus in beef cows: Effects of body condition and ovariectomy on serum luteinizing hormone and insulin-like growth factorI. Biol Reprod 1991; 44:961–966. http://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod44.6.961
  34. Jones JI, Clemmons DR. Insulin-like growth factors and their binding proteins: Biological actions. Endocr Rev 1995; 16:3–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/er.16.1.3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/edrv-16-1-3
  36. Yuan W, Bao B, Garverick HA, Youngquist RS, Lucy MC. Follicular dominance in cattle is associated with divergent patterns of ovarian gene expression for insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I, IGFII, and IGF binding protein-2 in dominant and subordinate follicles. Domest Anim Endocrinol 1998; 15: 55–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0739-7240(97)00062-3
  38. Mihm. M. Delayed resumption of cyclicity in postpartum dairy and beef cows Reprod Domest Anim 1999: 34:276-284.
  40. Butler WR. Energy balance relationships with follicular development, ovulation and fertility in postpartum dairy cows. Livest Prod Sci 2003; 83: 211–218 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(03)00112-X
  42. Spicer LJ. Leptin: A possible metabolic signal affecting reproduction. Domest Anim Endocrinol 2001; 21: 251–270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0739-7240(01)00120-5
  44. Dyer CJ, Simmons JM, Matteri RL, Keisler DH. Leptin receptor mRNA is expressed in ewe anterior pituitary and adipose tissues and is differentially expressed in hypothalamic regions of well-fed and feed-restricted ewes. Domest Anim Endocrinol 1997; 14:119–128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0739-7240(96)00119-1
  46. Amstalden M, Garcia MR, Williams SW, Stanko RL, Nizielski SE, Morrison SD et al. Leptin gene expression, circulating leptin, and luteinizing hormone pulsatility are acutely responsive to short-term fasting in prepubertal heifers: Relationships to circulating insulin and insulin-like growth factor-I. Biol Reprod 2000; 63:127–133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod63.1.127
  48. Jang M, Mistry A, Swick AG, Romsos DR. Leptin rapidly inhibits hypothalamic neuropeptide Y secretion and stimulates corticotropin-releasing hormone secretion in adrenalectomized mice. J Nutr 2000; 130(11): 2813–20.
  50. Liefers SC, Veerkamp RF, Te Pas MFW, Chilliard Y, Van der Lende T. Genetics and physiology of leptin in periparturient dairy cows. Domest Anim Endocrinol 2005; 29(1):227-238. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.domaniend.2005.02.009
  52. Block SS, Butler WR, Ehrhardt RA, Bell AW, Van Amburgh ME, Boisclair YR. Decreased concentration of plasma leptin in periparturient dairy cows is caused by negative energy balance. J Endocrinol 2001; 171(2):339–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1677/joe.0.1710339
  54. Brogan RS, Mitchell SE, Trayhurn P, Smith MS. Suppression of leptin during lactation: contribution of the suckling stimulus versus milk production. Endocrinology 1999; 140(6):2621–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/endo.140.6.6802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/en.140.6.2621
  56. Williams GL, Gazal, OS, Guzman Vega GA, Stanko RL. Mechanisms regulatin suckling-mediated anovulation in the cow. Anim Reprod Sci 1996; 42: 289-297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-4320(96)01531-X
  58. Day ML. Hormonal induction of estrous cycles in anestrous bos taurus beef cows. Anim Reprod Sci 2004; 82- 83:487-494.
  60. Gilad E, Meidan R, Berman A, Graber Y, Wolfenson D. Effect of heat stress on tonic and GnRH-induced gonadotrophin secretion in relation to concentration of oestradiol in plasma of cyclic cows. J Reprod Fertil 1993; 99:315–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0990315
  62. Wise ME, Armstrong DV, Huber JT, Hunter R, Wiersma F. Hormonal alterations in the lactating dairy cow in response to thermal stress. J Dairy Sci 1988; 71:2480–2485. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(88)79834-3
  64. De Rensis F, Scaramuzzi RJ. Heat stress and seasonal effects on reproduction in the dairy cow - a review. Theriogenology 2003; 60:1139–1151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(03)00126-2
  66. Wilson SJ, Marion RS, Spain JN, Spiers DE, Keisler DH, Lucy MC. Effect of controlled heat stress on ovarian function in dairy cattle: I. Lactating cows. J Dairy Sci 1998; 1:2124–2131. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)75788-1
  68. Kiracofe GH. Uterine involution: Its role in regulating postpartum intervals. J Anim Sci 1980; 51(Supp 2):16-28.
  70. Spicer LJ, Leung K, Convey EM, Gunther J, Short RE, Tucker HA. Anovulation in postpartum suckled beef cows. I. Associations among size and numbers of ovarian follicles, uterine involution, and hormones in serum and follicular fluid. J Anim Sci 1986; 62:734-741. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas1986.623734x
  72. Yavas Y, Walton JS. Postpartum aciclicity in suckled beef cows: a review. Theriogenology 2000; 54: 25-55 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(00)00322-8
  73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(00)00323-X
  75. Ruiz-Cortez ZT, Olivera-Angel M,. Ovarian follicular dynamics in suckled zebu (Bos indicus) cows monitored by real time ultrasonography. Anim Reprod Sci 1999; 54:211–220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(98)00152-3
  77. Stagg K, Diskin MG, Sreenan JM, Roche JF. Follicular development in long-term anoestrus suckler beef cows fed two levels of energy postpartum. Anim Reprod Sci 1995; 38:49–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-4320(94)01354-O
  79. Driancourt, MA. Follicular dynamics in sheep and cattle. Theriogenology 1991; 35:55–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(91)90148-7
  81. Fortune JE. Ovarian follicular growth and development in mammals. Biol Reprod 1994; 50:225–232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod50.2.225
  83. McNatty, KP, Heath DA, Henderson KM, Lun S, Hurst PR, Ellis LM et al. Some aspects of thecal and granulosa cell function during follicular development in the bovine ovary. J Reprod Fertil 1984; 72:39–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0720039
  85. Lamming GE, Wathes DC, Peters AR. Endocrine patterns in the post-partum cow. J Reprod Fert 1981; 30(Supp): 155–170.
  87. Lucy MC, Savio JD, Badinga L, De La Sota RL, Thatcher WW. Factors That Affect Ovarian Follicular Dynamics in Cattle. J Anim Sci 1992; 70:3615-3626 http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/1992.70113615x
  89. Wiltbank MC, Gumen A, Sartori R, Physiological classification of anovulatory conditions in cattle. Theriogenology 2002; 57:21–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00656-2
  91. Roche JF, Crowe MA, Boland MP. Postpartum anestrus in dairy and beef cows. Anim Reprod Sci 1992; 28:371– 378. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-4320(92)90123-U
  93. Murphy MG, Boland MP, Roche JF. Pattern of follicular growth and resumption of ovarian activity in postpartum beef suckler cows. J Reprod Fertil 1990; 90(2):523-533. http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0900523
  95. D'Occhio MJ, Neish A, Broadhurst L. Differences in gonadotrophin secretion post partum between Zebu and European breed cattle. Anim Reprod Sci 1990; 22:311–317. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-4320(90)90023-9
  97. Day ML, Dyer RM, Wilson GW, Pope WF. Influence of estradiol on duration of anestrus and incidence of short estrous cycles in postpartum cows. Domest Anim Endocrinol 1990; 7:19–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0739-7240(90)90050-A
  99. Zollers WG, Garverick HA, Smith MF, Moffatt RJ, Salfen BE, Youngquist RS. Concentrations of progesterone and oxytocin receptors in endometrium of post partum cows expected to have a short or normal oestrous cycle. J Reprod Fertil 1993; 97:329–337. http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0970329
  101. Mann GE, Lamming GE. The role of suboptimal preovulatory oestradiol secretion in the aetiology of premature luteolysis during the short oestrous cycle in the cow. Anim Reprod Sci 2000; 64(3-4):171-80.

Información

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

0.6
2020CiteScore
 
 
28th percentile
Powered by  Scopus
Redib Widget
Tutoriales

Autores:

¿Cómo enviar un artículo?

Par evaluador:

¿Cómo evaluar un artículo?

Palabras clave

Código QR

Número actual

Perfil de Google Scholar

Más leídos en los últimos 30 días

Sistema OJS 3.4.0.3 - Metabiblioteca |