Ir al menú de navegación principal Ir al contenido principal Ir al pie de página del sitio

Amamantamiento restringido y suplementación de semilla de algodón sobre el peso y condición corporal en vacas bajo sistema de producción doble propósito

Amamantamiento restringido y suplementación de semilla de algodón sobre el peso y condición corporal en vacas bajo sistema de producción doble propósito



Abrir | Descargar

Cómo citar
Salgado O., R., Torregroza S., L., & Álvarez P., J. (2005). Amamantamiento restringido y suplementación de semilla de algodón sobre el peso y condición corporal en vacas bajo sistema de producción doble propósito. Revista MVZ Córdoba, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.470

Dimensions
PlumX
Roger Salgado O.
Lino Torregroza S.
Jaime Álvarez P.

Roger Salgado O.

Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Departamento de Ciencias Pecuarias. Universidad de Córdoba

Lino Torregroza S.

Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Departamento de Ciencias Pecuarias. Universidad de Córdoba

Jaime Álvarez P.

Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Departamento de Ciencias Pecuarias. Universidad de Córdoba

En una finca, ubicada en el Valle del Sinú, departamento de Córdoba, con el objetivo de evaluar el efecto de la suplementación con semilla sobre el peso y la condición corporal de novillas en los últimos 30 días antes del parto, se tomaron trece novillas F1 Holstein x Cebú (HxC) y fueron distribuidas en dos grupos: grupo 1 (G1) conformado por 7 novillas que recibieron, además del pastoreo, 2kg de semilla de algodón; grupo 2 (G2), conformado por 6 novillas, que sólo tuvieron acceso a pastoreo. Después del parto hasta la semana catorce, se evaluó el efecto de la suplementación energética - proteica y el sistema de amamantamiento sobre el peso y la condición corporal para lo cual se conformaron 4 tratamientos: T1 conformado por 4 vacas, suplementadas con 2 kilogramos de semilla de algodón y amamantamiento experimental; T2 conformado por 3 vacas, suplementadas con 2 kilogramos de semilla de algodón y amamantamiento tradicional; T3 conformado por 3 vacas, sin suplemento y amamantamiento experimental; T4 conformado por 3 vacas sin suplemento y amamantamiento tradicional . Se utilizó un diseño completamente al azar con arreglo factorial 2 x 2 y para el análisis de resultados se empleó análisis de varianza. No se presento efecto (P>0.05) de los tratamientos pre y posparto sobre el peso y la condición corporal de los animales, resultado en parte coincidente y en parte contrario a trabajos experimentales disponibles en la literatura consultada.

Visitas del artículo 639 | Visitas PDF


Descargas

Los datos de descarga todavía no están disponibles.
  1. Agena S, Burstedt E, Holtenius K. Effects of Feeding Intensity During the Dry Period. 1. Feed Intake, body weight, and milk production. J Dairy Sci 2003; 86:870-882. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73670-4
  2. Cavestany D, Galina CS, Vi-oles C. Efecto de las características del reinicio de la actividad ovárica posparto en la eficiencia reproductiva de vacas Holstein en pastoreo. Arch Med Vet 2001; 33:217-226. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0301-732X2001000200010
  3. Cavestany D, Blanc JE, Kulcsar M, Uriarte G, Chilibroste P, Meikle A. Febel H, Ferraris A, Krall E. Studies of the transition cow under a pasture-based milk production system: Metabolic Profiles. J Vet Med 2005; 52:1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0442.2004.00679.x
  4. Chilliard Y. Physiological constraints to milk production: factors which determine nutrient partitioning, lactation persistency and mobilization of body reserves. World Rev Anim Prod 1992; 19-26.
  5. Coffey MP, Simm JD, Oldham JD, Hill WG, Brotherstone S. Genotype and diet effects on energy balance in the first three lactations of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2004; 87:4318-4326. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73577-8
  6. Dann HM, Varga GA, Putnam DE. Improving energy supply to late gestation and early postpartum dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 1999; 82:1765-1778. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75407-X
  7. Das SM, Forsberg M, Wiktorsson H. Influence of restricted suckling and level of feed supplementation on postpartum reproductive performance of zebu and crossbred cattle in the semi-arid tropics. Acta Vet Scan 1999; 40:57-67.
  8. Doepel L, Lapierre H, Kennelly JJ. Peripartum performance and metabolism of dairy cows in response to prepartum energy and protein Intake. J Dairy Sci 2002; 85:2315-2334. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74312-9
  9. Ferreira A. Efeito da amamantamentacao e do nivel nutricional na atividae ovariana de vacas mestizas leiteiras. Tesis de Doctorado 1990. Universidad Federal de Vicosa, Minas Gerais. 134p.
  10. Garnsworthy PC, Topps JH. The effect of body condition of dairy cows at calving on their food intake and performance when given complete diets. Anim Prod 1982; 35:113-119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003356100000878
  11. Goff JP, Horst RL. Physiological changes at parturition and their relationship to metabolic disorders. J Dairy Sci 1997; 80:1260-1268. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76055-7
  12. González, TM. Manejo de amamantamiento como una alternativa para mejorar el desempe-o reproductivo en el ganado bovino. En: Boletín técnico. Nº 03. (1994); p.3
  13. Grainger C, Wilhelms GD, McGowan AA. Performance of Friesian cows with high or low breeding index. Anim Prod 1982; 40:379-388. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003356100040101
  14. Greenfield R B, Cecava MJ, Johnson TR, Donkin SS. Impact of dietary protein amount and rumen undegradability on intake, peripartum liver triglyceride, plasma metabolites and milk production in transition dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 2000; 83:703–710. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)74932-0
  15. Grummer RR. Etiology of lipid-related metabolic disorders in periparturient dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 1993; 76:3882–3896. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(93)77729-2
  16. Grummer, RR. Impact of changes in organic nutrient metabolism on feeding the transition dairy cow. J Anim Sci 1995; 73:2820–2833. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/1995.7392820x
  17. Hill JR, Godke RA. Limited nursing effects on reproductive performance of primiparous and multiparous cows and preweaning calf performance. Can J Anim Sci 1987; 67: 615- 622. http://dx.doi.org/10.4141/cjas87-064
  18. Holcomb CS, Van Horn HH, Head HH, Hall MB, Wilcox CJ. Effects of prepartum dry matter intake and forage percentage on postpartum performance of lactating dairy cows. 2001; J Dairy Sci 84:2051–2058. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)74649-8
  19. Holter JB, Slotnick MJ, Hayes HH, Bozak CK. Effect of Prepartum dietary energy on condition score, postpartum energy, nitrogen partitions, and lactation production responses. J Dairy Sci 1990; 73:3502-3511 http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(90)79050-9
  20. Ingvartsen KL, Friggens NC, Faverdin P. Food intake regulation in late pregnancy and early lactation. Br Soc Anim Sci 1999; 24:37–54.
  21. Keady TWJ, Mayne CS, Fitzpatrick DA, McCoy MA. Effect of concentrate feed level in late gestation on subsequent milk yield, milk composition, and fertility of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2001; 84:1468–1479. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)70180-4
  22. Lanna DP, Houseknecht LK, Harris MD, et al. Effect of somatotropin treatment on lipogeneses, lipolysis, and related cellular mechanisms in adipose tissue of lactating cows. J Dairy Sci 1995; 78: 1703-1712. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(95)76795-9
  23. Mancio A, Hernandez F, Fonseca F. Efeito da amamentacao controlada ou interompida sobre o desempenho reproductivo de vacas de corte. Revista Medica Zootecnia. 1998; 50: 765-770.
  24. Marston TT, Lusby KS, Wettemann RP, Purvis HT: Effects of feeding energy or protein supplements before or after calving on performance of spring-calving cows grazing native range. J Anim Sci 1995; 73: 657-664. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/1995.733657x
  25. Maza A. Efeito da condicao corporal ao parto e da producao de leite sobre comportamento reproductivo e variacao de peso corporal no pós-parto de vacas mesticas leiteiras. 1997; Tesis de Maestria Universidad federal de viçosa. Minas Gerais, Brasil.
  26. Maza L, Salgado R, Vergara O. Efecto de la condición corporal al parto sobre el comportamiento reproductivo y variación de peso corporal postparto de vacas mestizas lecheras. Rev MVZ Córdoba 2001; 6: 75-80.
  27. McNamara S, O'Mara FP, Rath M, Murphy JJ. Effects of different transition diets on dry matter intake, milk production, and milk composition in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2003; 86:2397– 2408. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73834-X
  28. Moore CP. El destete temprano y su efecto en la reproducción del Ganado bovino tropical. Rev Mundial de Zoot 1984; 49: 39-50.
  29. Moore PC, Campos Da Rocha CM. Reproductive performance of gyr cows: The effect of weaning age of calves and postpartum energy intake. J Anim Sci 1983; 57: 807-814. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas1983.574807x
  30. Oxenreider SL, Wagner WC. Effect of lactation and energy intake on postpartum ovarian activity in the cow. J Anim Sci 1971; 33: 1026 – 1031. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas1971.3351026x
  31. Putnam DE, Varga GA. Protein density and its influence on metabolite concentration and nitrogen retention by holstein cows in late gestation. J Dairy Sci 1998; 81:1608–1618. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)75727-3
  32. Rabelo E, Rezende RL, Bertics SJ, Grummer RR. Effects of transition diets varying in dietary energy density on lactation performance and ruminal parameters of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2003; 86:916–925. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73674-1
  33. Remond B, Cisse M, Ollier A, Chilliard Y. Slow release somatotropin in dairy heifers and cows fed two levels of energy concentrate. Performance and body condition. J Dairy Sci 1991; 74:1370-1381. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78292-1
  34. Rayner IH, Edmunds J, Stokde J. Comparison of dairy and multiple sucled calf production with calf access restricted. Aust J Exper Agric Anim Husb 1977; 88:728-734. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/EA9770728
  35. Reist M, Erdin D, von Euw D, Tschuemperlin K, Leuenberger H, Delavaud C, Chilliard Y, Hammon HM, Kuenzi N, Blum JW. Concentrate feeding strategy in lactating dairy cows: Metabolic and endocrine changes with emphasis on Leptin. J Dairy Sci 2003; 86:1690-1706. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73755-2
  36. Sanz A, Casasús I, Villalba D, Revilla R. Effects of suckling frequency and reed on productive performance, follicular dynamics and postpartum interval in beef cows. Anim Repr Sc 2003; 79:57-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(03)00116-7
  37. Schlink AC, Gibson DS, Liang ZJ, Dixon R. Calf management strategies and reproductive performance in a northern Australian cattle herd. Proc Austr Soc Anim Prod 1988; 17: 326- 329.
  38. Schlink AC, Houston EM, Entwistle KW. Impact of long term early weaning on the productivity of Bos indicus cross cow.; Proc Austr Soc Anim Prod 1994; 20:339.
  39. Sullivan RM, O,Rourke PK, Robertson DL, Cooke D. Effects of once-yearly weanyng on some aspects of herd productivity in an extensive herd in the semi-arid tropics of northern Australia. 1992; Austr J Exp Agric 32: 149-156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/EA9920149
  40. Short RE, Bellows RA, Moody EL, Howland BE. Effects of suckling and mastectomy on bovine postpartum reproduction. J Anim Sci 1972; 34: 70-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas1972.34170x
  41. Radford HM, Nancarrow CD, Mattner PE. Ovarian function in suckling and non sucling beef cows post partum. J Reprod Fert 1978; 54:49-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0540049
  42. Triplett BL, Neuendorff DA, Randel RD. Influence of undegraded intake protein supplementation on milk production, weight gain, and reproductive performance in postpartum brahman cows. 1995; 73:3223- 3229.
  43. VandeHaar MJ, Yousif G, Sharma BK, Herdt TH, Emery RS, Allen MS, Liesman JS. Effect of energy and protein density of prepartum diets on fat and protein metabolism of dairy cattle in the periparturient period. J Dairy Sci 1999; 82:1282-1295. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75351-8
  44. Van Saun RJ, Idleman SC, Sniffen CJ. Effect of undegradable protein amount fed prepartum on postpartum production in first lactation Holstein cows. J Dairy Sci 1993; 76:236-244. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(93)77342-7

Sistema OJS 3.4.0.3 - Metabiblioteca |