The relation between the implementation of learning objects and listening skills

Contenido principal del artículo


Royer David Redondo Castro Iranys Urbina Gutiérrez



Los objetos virtuales de aprendizaje (OVAS) son unidades digitales auto-contenibles que pueden ser combinadas para crear una variedad de experiencias de aprendizaje. Sin embargo, pocas instituciones de nivel superior en Colombia están utilizando OVAS para su enseñanza. La Universidad Popular del Cesar es una de estas instituciones de nivel superior donde los OVAS habían sido implementados sin conocer que tan útil o inadecuado era su uso. Consecuentemente, este artículo resalta la relación entre la implementación de los OVAS y el desarrollo de la habilidad de escucha en un grupo de estudiantes en esta universidad. Los resultados de esta investigación revelan que la adecuada mediación del docente fue fundamental para que el grupo de estudiantes se beneficiara del uso de los OVAS.

Palabras claves: Implementación, mediación del profesor.



Learning objects (LOs) are material digital instructional units that can be combined to create a variety of learning experiences. However, few Higher education institutions in Colombia are using LOs for teaching purposes. Universidad Popular del Cesar is one of those educational institutions where LOs had been implemented without knowing how meaningful or inadequate its use was. Hence, this article underlines the relation between the implementation of LOs and the development of listening skills in a group of students at this university. The research results reveal that since teacher mediation was accurate to the target lesson, the chosen group of students derived benefit from using LOs.

Keywords: Implementation, teacher mediation

Detalles del artículo


Akpinar, Y., &Simsek, H. (2007). Should K-12 teachers develop learning objects? Evidence
from thefield with K12 students. International Journal of Instructional Technology and
Distance Learning, 4(3), 31-44.
ASTD and Smartforce. (2002). A field guide to learning objects.
Retrieved May 12, 2009, from
Atkins, D. E., Brown, J. S., &Hammond, A. L. (2007). A review of the open educational resources
(OER) movement: Achievements, challenges, and new opportunities (Report to the William
and Flora Hewlett Foundation). p. 4. Retrieved from
Brown, S. (2006). Teaching Listening. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Burge, E., Campbell Gibson, C., &Gibson, T. (Eds.). (2011). Flexible pedagogy, flexible practice:
Notes from the trenches of distance education. Athabasca: Athabasca University Press.
Burns, A., and Hood, S. (1995). Teachers’ Voices: Exploring course design in a changing curriculum.
Sydney: Natural Center for English Language Teaching and Research.
Caws, C. (2008). Development and implementation of a learning object repository for French teaching
and learning: Issues and promises. CALICO Journal. 26(1), 123-141.
Cramer, S.R. (2007). Update your classroom with learning objects and twenty-first century skills. The
Clearing House, 80(3), 126-132.
Creswell, J. W (2007). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing among five approaches
(2nd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
De Salas, K. & Ellis, L. (2006). The development and implementation of learning objects in a higher
education setting[Electronic version]. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning
Objects, 2, 1-22.
Feagin, J., Orum, A., & Sjoberg, G. (Eds.). (1991). A case for case study. Chapel Hill, NC: University
of North Carolina Press.
Field, J. (2002). The changing face of listening. In J. Richards & W. Renandya(Eds.), Methodology
in language teaching: An anthology of current practice(pp. 242–247). New York: Cambridge
University press.
Freeman, D. (1998). Doing Teacher Research: From Inquiry to Understanding. Boston, MA:
Heinle&Heinle Publishers.
Govindasamy, T. (2001). Successful implementation of e-learning: pedagogical considerations.
TheInternet and Higher Education, 4(3–4), 287–299.
Hernandez Sampieri, R., Fernandez Collado, C., & Baptista Lucio, P. (2010). Metodologia de la
Investigación. Mexico: McGraw Hill.
Hoey, M. (2001). Textual interaction: an introduction to written discourse analysis. New York:
Kay, R., & Knaack, L. (2007). Evaluating the learning in learning objects. Open Learning: The Journal
of Open and Distance Learning, 22(1), 5–28. Philadelphia, PA: Johan Benjamins Publishing
Li, J. Z., Nesbit, J. C., & Richards, G. (2006). Evaluating learning objects across boundaries: The semantics of localization. Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 4(1), 17-30.
Leon, O., & Montero , I. (2003). Métodos de Investigación en Psicología y Educación. Madrid:
McGraw Hill.
Lodico, M., Spaulding, D., and Voegtle, K. (2010). Methods in Educational Research. San Francisco,
CA: Jossey Bass.
McGreal, R. (2004). Learning objects: A practical definition. International Journal of Instructional
Technology and Distance Learning, 1(9). Retrieved May 15, 2010, from
Ministerio de Educación Nacional. (2006b).¿Qué es un Objeto Virtual de Aprendizaje? Recuperadoel
19 de septiembre de 2011, de Colombia Aprende - Docentes de Superior - Objetos Virtuales
de Aprendizaje e Informativos:
Morley, J. (2001). Aural comprehension instruction: Principles and practices. In M. Celce-Murcia
(Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language(pp. 69-85).Boston: Heinle&Heinle
QSR International Pty Ltd . (2007, August 15). What is Qualitative Research? Retrieved October 26,
2010, from
Young, M. Y. C. (1997). A serial ordering of listening comprehension strategies used by advanced
ESL learners in Hong Kong. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 1, 35-53.
Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Tellis, W. (1997). Application of a case study methodology . The Qualitative Report, 3(3). Retrieved
UNESCO OER platform to be tested at celebrations of world press freedom day in windhoek.(2011,
May 02). African Press Organisation.Database of Press Releases Related to Africa. p. 1.
Retrieved from
Vandergrift, L. (2003). Orchestrating strategy use: toward a model ofThe skilled second language
listener. Language Learning,53(3), 463-496. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9922.00232
Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage


La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.