Principales desafíos y oportunidades de los sistemas de Internet de las cosas médicas - IoMT

Principales desafíos y oportunidades de los sistemas de Internet de las cosas médicas - IoMT

En la actualidad hay millones de dispositivos IoT que utilizan las personas para la atención médica. Un IoT con dispositivos médicos se le conoce también como Internet de las cosas médicas (Internet of Medical Things - IoMT). Existen diversas aplicaciones IoMT como (Gómez et al., 2016; Alsubaei, et al., 2019; Basatneh et al.,2018; Nayyar et al., 2019; Pustokhina et al., 2019) entre otras. Los escenarios donde se utiliza esta tecnología son: asistencia a signos vitales de pacientes; monitoreo de información sanitaria; monitoreo en la ingesta de alimentos; monitoreo de señalepatológicas y fisiológicas; asistencia al personal sanitario; autogestión, bienestar y prevención; seguimiento de enfermedades entre otras.

1. Gómez, J., Oviedo, B., & Zhuma, E. (2016). Patient monitoring system based on
2. internet of things. Procedia Computer Science, 83, 90-97.
3. Alsubaei, F., Abuhussein, A., Shandilya, V., & Shiva, S. (2019). IoMT-SAF: Internet of
4. medical things security assessment framework. Internet of Things, 8, 100123.
5. Basatneh, R., Najafi, B., & Armstrong, D. G. (2018). Health sensors, smart home
6. devices, and the internet of medical things: an opportunity for dramatic improvement in
7. care for the lower extremity complications of diabetes. Journal of diabetes science and
8. technology, 12(3), 577-586.
9. Nayyar, A., Puri, V., & Nguyen, N. G. (2019). BioSenHealth 1.0: a novel internet of
10. medical things (IoMT)-based patient health monitoring system. In International
11. Conference on Innovative Computing and Communications (pp. 155-164). Springer,
12. Singapore.
13. Pustokhina, I. V., Pustokhin, D. A., Gupta, D., Khanna, A., Shankar, K., & Nguyen, G. N.
14. (2020). An effective training scheme for deep neural network in edge computing
15. enabled Internet of medical things (IoMT) systems. IEEE Access, 8, 107112-107123.
16. Adams K, Agesen O (2006) A comparison of software and hardware techniques for x86
17. virtualization. In: International conference on architectural support for programming
18. languages and operating systems, pp 2–13
19. Xian C, Lu Y-H, Li Z (2007) Adaptive computation offloading for energy conservation on
20. battery-powered systems. In: International conference on parallel and distributed
21. systems, pp 1–8
22. Vaughan-Nichols, S. J. (2006). New approach to virtualization is a
23. lightweight. Computer, 39(11), 12-14.
24. Alves, M. P., Delicato, F. C., Santos, I. L., & Pires, P. F. (2020). LW-CoEdge: a
25. lightweight virtualization model and collaboration process for edge computing. World
26. Wide Web, 23(2), 1127-1175.
27. Narayanan, V., Huang, Y., Tan, G., Jaeger, T., & Burtsev, A. (2020, March). Lightweight
28. kernel isolation with virtualization and VM functions. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM
29. SIGPLAN/SIGOPS International Conference on Virtual Execution Environments (pp.
30. -171).
31. Mohammed, A. H., KHALEEFAH, R. M., & Abdulateef, I. A. (2020, June). A Review
32. Software Defined Networking for Internet of Things. In 2020 International Congress on
33. Human-Computer Interaction, Optimization and Robotic Applications (HORA) (pp. 1-8).
34. IEEE.
35. Rafique, W., Qi, L., Yaqoob, I., Imran, M., Rasool, R. U., & Dou, W. (2020).
36. Complementing IoT services through software defined networking and edge computing:
37. A comprehensive survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 22(3), 1761-1804.