Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Response of cocoa seedlings (Theobroma cacao L.) variety FSV-094 to mycorrhizal inoculation under nursery conditions

Respuesta micorrizal de plántulas de cacao (Theobroma cacao L.) variedad FSV-094 a la aplicación de diferentes inóculos micorrizales



How to Cite
Sierra Escobar, J. A., & Murcia Morales, H. . (2022). Response of cocoa seedlings (Theobroma cacao L.) variety FSV-094 to mycorrhizal inoculation under nursery conditions . Sour Topics, 27(1), 220-230. https://doi.org/10.21897/rta.v27i1.2975

Dimensions
PlumX
Jorge Alberto Sierra Escobar
Hyeraldy Murcia Morales

A greenhouse experiment was carried out to evaluate the mycorrhizal response of seedlings of cocoa (Theobroma cacao variedad FSV-094) to the application of different mycorrhizal inoculum. A complete randomized  experimental design was used, with four treatments: three commercial mycorrhizal multispore inoculum, Ab (Glomus spp, Scuttellospora spp y Entrophospora spp), Bs (Glomus spp, Acaulospora spp, Entrophospora spp, y Scutellospora spp) y Bl (Rhizophagus irregularis, R. clarus, R. aggregatus, R. proliferum y Claroideoglomus etunicatum),  and the negative control (without inoculation), each treatment was established in the same soil that was adjusted 0.02 mg L-1 of phosphorus (P). Shoot and root dry weight (SDW & RDW), mycorrhizal colonization, leaf P content, and mycorrhizal response were measured. The results indicated that all the inoculum showed colonization, the best treatments were Ab and Bs with values of 27 and 28% respectively. Although there were no significant differences, the Ab and Bs treatments always had higher values in terms of SDW (3,4 y 3,7 g) and leaf P (0,25 y 0,2%). Regarding to mycorrhizal response, it was found that when inoculated with Bs and Ab the response was moderate (25 - 50%), and with Bl marginal (≤ 24%). The use of commercial AMF can lead to a differential response to T. cacao variety FSV-094. Therefore, it is suggested to carry out an evaluation of the mycorrhizal inoculum in relation to the genotype before massively using it to produce cocoa seedlings under greenhouse.


Article visits 255 | PDF visits


Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Abarca, X. A., y Gómez, S. E. 2020. Efecto de la inoculación de micorrizas benéficas Mycoral®️ en patrones de cacao (Theobroma cacao L.) En la etapa de desarrollo vegetativo.
  2. Arvelo-Sánchez, M. Á., Delgado, T., Maroto, S., Rivera, J., Higuera, I., and Navarro, A. 2016. Estado actual sobre la producción y el comercio del cacao en América.
  3. Aziz, T. and M. Habte. 1987. Determining vesicular-arbuscular micorrizal effectiveness by monitoring P status of leaf disk. Can. J. Microbiol, 33: 1097-1101
  4. Ballesteros-Possú W., Unigarro A., Cadena-Ortega C.E. y Cadena-Ortega J. A. 2004. Evaluacion de hongos formadores de micorrizas vesiculo arbusculares (MVA) en la etapa de almacigo de cacao (Theobroma cacao l.), en Tumaco, Nariño. Revista de Ciencias Agrícolas - Volumen XXI - número I - II .
  5. Brundrett, M.C. and Tedersoo, L. 2018: Evolutionary history of mycorrhizal symbioses and global plant diversity. New Phytologist 220:1108-1115.
  6. Delgado-Ospina, J., Molina-Hernández JB., Chaves-López, C., Romanazzi, G., and Paparella, A. 2021. The role of fungi in the cocoa production chain and the challenge of climate change. Journal of Fungi, 7(3), 202. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7030202
  7. Eris, F.R., Maida, H., Hastuti, D., & Denny, Y. R. (2022). Effect of biofertilizer formulation with addition of consortium of microbes and biosurfactant DEA palm olein to growth of cacao seedling. IOP Conference Series. Earth and Environmental Science, 978(1) https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/978/1/012013
  8. FEDECACAO. 2014. Manual de buenas prácticas agrícolas BPA, en el cultivo del cacao. Ministerio de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural. Industrias Graficas.
  9. Fox, R. and Kamprath, E. 1970. Phosphate sorption isotherms for evaluating the phosphate requirements of soils. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings, 34: 902-907.
  10. Giovannetti, M. and Mosse, B. 1980. An evaluation of techniques for measuring vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal infection in roots. New Phytol, 84: 489-500
  11. Gómez, S.R., Acevedo, L.J.G., and Guio, J.J.G. 2020. Evaluación de la eficiencia de micorrizas arbusculares y plantas de vetiver (Chrysopogon zizanioides) como agentes fitorremediadores para la reducción de cadmio en cultivos de cacao de la granja del centro de atención al sector agropecuario-SENA. Revista INNDECOMM, 2.
  12. Gonzalez, O. y Osorio, N.W. 2008. Determinación de la dependencia micorrizal en lulo. Acta biol. Colomb., Vol. 13 No. 2, 163 – 174.
  13. Habte, M. and Manjunath, A. 1987. Soil solution phosphorus status and mycorrhizal dependency in Leucaena leucocephala. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 53: 797-801.
  14. Habte, M. and Osorio, N.W. 2001. Arbuscular Mycorrhizas: Producing and applying Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Inoculum. University of Hawaii, Honolulu, 47 p.
  15. Holdridge, L.R. 1967. Life zone ecology. Tropical Science Center.
  16. Jaramillo, S. and Osorio, W. 2009. Mycorrhizal dependency of coffee seedling at different levels of soil solution phosphorus. Suelos Ecuatoriales 39 (1): 100-106
  17. Kormanik, P.P., McGraw, A.C. and Schultz, R.C. 1980. Procedure and equipment for staining a large number of plant samples for endomycorrhizal assay. Can. J. Microbiol, 26: 536-538
  18. Leblanc, H.A., Márquez, E. 2014. Efecto de los hongos formadores de micorrizas arbusculares en el desarrollo de plantas de cacao en vivero. Tierra Tropical. 10(2): 191-200.
  19. Lovera, M y Cuenca, G.2007. Diversidad de hongos micorrízico arbusculares (HMA) del suelo de una sabana natural y sabana perturbada de la Gran Sabana. Venezuela. Interciencia. Volumen 32 # 2.
  20. Murphy, J. and Riley, J.P. 1962. A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Analytica Chimica Acta, 27:31-35.
  21. Nasaruddin, & Ridwan, I. 2018. Effectivity of azotobacter chroococcum and arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi on physiological characteristics and growth of cocoa seedlings. IOP Conference Series. Earth and Environmental Science, 157(1) https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/157/1/012014
  22. Nieves-Orduña, H. E., Müller, M., Krutovsky, K. V. & Gailing, O. 2021. Geographic patterns of genetic variation among cacao (0RW1S34RfeSDcfkexd09rT2theobroma cacao1RW1S34RfeSDcfkexd09rT2 L.) populations based on chloroplast markers. Diversity, 13(6), 249. https://doi.org/10.3390/d13060249
  23. Oladele, S.O. 2015. Mycorrhizal fungus (Glomus mossae) inoculation effects on performance and root biomass development of cacao seedlings in the nursery. Agriculture & Forestry, Vol. 61, Issue 3: 69-76. http://www.agricultforest.ac.me/paper.php?id=2439
  24. Osorio, N.W. 2014. Manejo de suelo del trópico. Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Sede Medellín. Editorial L. Vieco SAS. 411 pp.
  25. Oyeneyin, E. 2018. Effects of Watering Regime and Mycorrhizal Inoculation on Seedling Growth and Drought Tolerant Traits of Cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) Varieties. International Journal of Horticulture ; Richmond Tomo 8, N.º 13.
  26. Padjung, R., Saad, S.H., Bahrun, A.H. and I. Ridwan. 2019. Growth and development of Theobroma cacao seedlings as a response to different dosages of vermicompost and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Earth and Environmental Science 343: 012017 IOP Publishing. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/343/1/012017
  27. Phillips, J.M. and D.S. Hayman. 1970. improved procedures for clearing and staining parasitic and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection. Transactions of the British Mycological Society, 55: 158-161.
  28. Plenchette, C., Fortin, A. and Furlan, V. 1983. Growth responses of several plant species to mycorrhizae in a soil of moderate P-fertility. I. Mycorrhizal dependency under field conditions. Plant and Soil, 70: 191-209.
  29. Porter, W. 1979. The “Most Probable Number” method for ennumerating infective propagules of vesicular arbuscular micorrizal fungi in soil. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 17: 515-519.
  30. Ramirez, J.G., Osorno, L., & Nelson, W. O. (2016). Presence of mycorrhizal fungi and a fluorescent pseudomonas sp. in the rhizosphere of cacao in two agroecosystems and their effects on cacao seedling growth. Agronomía Colombiana, 34(3), 385-392. http://mr.crossref.org/iPage?doi=10.15446%2Fagron.colomb.v34n3.57950
  31. Sierra-Escobar, J.A., Castro-Restrepo, D. and Osorio, W. 2015. Mycorrhizal Dependency of Alcaparro (Senna pistaciifolia Kunth) at Three Concentrations of Soil Solution Phosphorus. Rev.Fac.Nal.Agr.Medellín 68(1): 7451-7458.
  32. Tuesta-Pinedo, A.L., Trigozo-Bartra, E., Cayotopa-Torres, J.J., Arévalo-Gardini, E., Arévalo-Hernández, C.O., Zúñiga-Cernadez, L.B., y Leon-Ttacca, B. 2017. Optimización de la fertilización orgánica e inorgánica del cacao (Theobroma Cacao L.) con la inclusión de Trichoderma endófito y Micorrizas arbusculares. Vol. 30-1. Enero-Marzo. Pág 67-78. https://doi.org/10.18845/tm.v30i1.3086
  33. Vandenkoornhuyse, P., Husband, R., Daniell, I.J., Watson, J.M., Duck, M., Fitter, A.H., and Young, J.P.W. 2002. Arbuscular mycorrhizal community composition associated with two plant species in grassland ecosystem. Mol. Ecol. 1555 - 1564.
  34. Vargas - Álvarez, E.A. 2018. La producción y las exportaciones de cacao colombiano entre 2007 y el 2016: desafíos para lograr mayor competitividad en el mercado internacional (Bachelor's thesis, Fundación Universidad de América).
  35. Wagner, B., Pimentel, E., Marcano, I., Kabe C., Colin, B., and Núñez P. 2021. Identificación de micorrizas asociadas con el cultivo de cacao en la Estación Experimental Engombe de la UASD. APF -Vol 10, (01): 53 - 68
  36. Walker, C. and J.M. Trappe. 1993. Names and epithets in the Glomales and Endogonales. Mycological Research, 97: 339-344.

Sistema OJS 3.4.0.3 - Metabiblioteca |