Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Development of polyurethanes with phytoavailable boron retention capacity

Desarrollo de poliuretanos con capacidad de retención de boro fiodisponible



How to Cite
Palencia, M., Afanasjeva, N., & Benavidez, E. (2015). Development of polyurethanes with phytoavailable boron retention capacity. Sour Topics, 20(2), 49-57. https://doi.org/10.21897/rta.v20i2.758

Dimensions
PlumX
Manuel Palencia
Natalia Afanasjeva
Erika Benavidez

For fertilization of crops with boric acid (H3 BO3 ), the use of material with capacity of charge (boron retention) and discharge (boron release) has potential applications in the development of fertilization systems and in the treatment of irrigation water. This study sought to obtain a composite material from polyurethanes (PUs) and N-(4-vinylbencil)- N-methyl-D-glucamine (VbNMDG) by using the technique of interpenetrating polymer networks (IPN), with potential applications in the development of boron fertilization systems. To that end, several PUs were synthesized from an isocyanate (methylendiphenyl-isocianate, MDI) and polyols with variable molecular weight (ethylene glycol, glycerol and manitol). PUs were used as a support matrix and a second network was synthesized by free radical polymerization of VbNMDG, which was previously synthesized by nucleophilic substitution between 4-vinylbenzyl chloride and N-methylD-glucamine. Capacity of retention and release of boron were evaluated by batch experiments and the quantification of boron concentration was estimated using azomethine-H method. Results suggest that IPNs obtained from manitol have a larger retention capacity of H3 BO3 than those obtained from ethylene glycol and glycerol. Retention properties of IPNs increase as the R-OH/H3 BO3 ratio increases. The study concluded that IPNs can be obtained from PUs and poli(VbNMDG) using dioxane as solvent.

Article visits 796 | PDF visits


Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Abu-Sharar, T. Bani, N.and Al-Khader, S. 2014. Boron adsorption–desorption characteristics of irrigated soils in the Jordan Valley. Geoderma Regional, (2), p50-59.
  2. Ahmad, W., Zia, M., Malhi, S. and Niaz, A. 2012. Boron Defiiency in soils and crops: a review. Crop Plant, p77-114.
  3. Blevins, D. and Lukaszewski, K. 1998. Boron in plant structure and function, Annual Reviews Plant Physiology Plant Molecular Biology 49(1):481–500.
  4. Handreck, K. 1990. Methods of assessing boron availability in potting media with special reference to toxicity. Communication in Soil Science Plant Analysis. 21(19-20): 2265-2280.
  5. Hu, H., Brown, P. and Labavitch, J. 1996. Species variability in boron requirements is correlated with cell wall pectin. Journal Experimental Botany 47(2): 227-232.
  6. Janik, H. and Marzec, M. 2015. A review: Fabrication of porous polyurethane scaffolds. Materials Science and Engineering: C. 48:586-591.
  7. Kot, F. 2015. Boron in the Environment. Boron Separation Processes. Elsevier. p 1-33.
  8. Lvov, Y. and Abdullayev, E. 2013. Functional polymer–clay nanotube composites with sustained release of chemical agentss. Progress in Polymer Science, 38(10):1690-1719.
  9. Majidi, A., Rahnemaie, R., Hassani, A. and Malakouti M. 2010. Adsorption and desorption processes of boron in calcareous soils. Chemosphere, 80(7): 733-739.
  10. Navarro, S. y Navarro, G. 2003. Química agrícola: El suelo y los elementos químicos esenciales para la vida vegetal. 2a ed. Mundi-prensa, Barcelona. 487 p.
  11. Palencia, M., Vera, M. and Rivas B. 2014. Modifiation of ultrafitration via membranes interpenetrating polymer networks for removal of boron from aqueous solution. Journal Membrane Science 466:192-199.
  12. Palencia, M., Vera, M. and Combatt, E. 2014. Polymer network based in (4-vinylbenzyl)-N-metil-D-glucaminesuppourted on microporous polypropylene layers with retention boron capacity. Journal Applied Polymer Science 131(16):40653-40660.
  13. Penagos, D., Restrepo, H. and Palencia, M. 2015. Grafting Polymer Based in Active Polyurethane Matrixes Via Free Radical. Procedia Materials Science 9:491-495.
  14. Polat, H., Vengosh, A., Pankratov, I. and Polat, M. 2004. A new methodology for removal of boron from water by coal and fl ash, Desalination, 164(2):173-188.
  15. Reid, R. 2010. Can we really increase yields by making crop plants tolerant to boron toxicity?.PlantScience, 178(1):9-11.
  16. Rivas, B., Pereira, E., Palencia, M. and Sánchez, J. 2011. Water-soluble functional polymers in conjunction with membranes to remove pollutant ions from aqueous solutions, Progress in Polymer Science, 36(2):294-322.
  17. Roig-Navarro, A., López, F. and Hernández, F. 1996. Application of azomethine-H method to the determination of boron in workplace atmospheres from ceramic factories, Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 356(1):103-106.
  18. Sah, R. and Brown, P. 1997. Boron determination - a review of analytical methods. Microchemical Journal, 56(3):285-304.
  19. Ulbricht, U. 2006. Advanced functional polymer membranes, Polymer 47(7):2217-262.
  20. Urbano, B. and Rivas, B. 2012. Water-insoluble nanocomposite ion exchange resin based on N-methyl-D-glucamine ligand groups for arsenic removal. Reactive FunctionalPolymer, 72(9) :642-649.
  21. Vera, M., Combatt, E. y Palencia, M. 2014. Estudio de la capacidad de retención de boro disponible en suelos mediante membranas funcionales con cadenas de polioles. Temas Agrarios 19 (1):96-105.

Sistema OJS 3.4.0.3 - Metabiblioteca |