Resistance to powdery mildew (Erysiphe polygoni) and yield on afila pea (Pisum sativum L.)

Resistencia a oídio (Erysiphe polygoni) y rendimiento en arveja afila (Pisum sativum L.)

Published 2015-11-12

Open | Download
PDF FLIP HTML XML PDF (Spanish) FLIP HTML (Spanish) XML (Spanish)
How to Cite
Checa, O., & Rodríguez, M. (2015). Resistance to powdery mildew (Erysiphe polygoni) and yield on afila pea (Pisum sativum L.). Sour Topics, 20(2), 58-71. https://doi.org/10.21897/rta.v20i2.759
doi

https://doi.org/10.21897/rta.v20i2.759
Dimensions
PlumX
license
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Oscar Checa
Universidad de Nariño
Marino Rodríguez
Universidad de Nariño
Show authors biography
In the past five years in the department of Nariño, the increase in severity of damage produced by oidio (Erysiphe polygoni) in vetch has been observed, which produces loss of yield crop between 20 and 40%. The improved varieties present susceptibility to the pathogen. This research was conducted in SENA’s Lopez Farm in Pasto - Colombia, in two phases. In the first phase, 90 lines of pea were evaluated (Pisum sativum L.) along with the gen afila for yield and reaction to powdery mildew (Erysiphe polygoni) under natural inoculate conditions. The assessed lines were obtained by simple crosses and backcrosses between the parentals Andina, San Isidro, and Sindamanoy, and the donor genotypes of the afila gen: Dove, ILS3568 and ILS3575. A random augmented blocks design was used. Results showed that 10% of the materials were resistant to powdery mildew, 20% were moderately resistant, 60% were moderately susceptible, and 10% were susceptible. From these materials, 19 resistant and moderately resistant genotypes with the highest yield were selected, which were assessed in the second phase for yield and components. For green pod yield and dry grain, 84% and 68.4% of the tested lines reached similar averages than those in the commercial controls Sindamanoy and Andina. The selected lines with the gen afila recovered 88,42% of the yield and yield components from their parents Andina, San Isidro, and Sindamanoy.

Article visits 1725 | PDF visits

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Checa, O. 2014. Investigación para el mejoramiento de la tecnología de producción de arveja (Pisum sativum L.) en el departamento de Nariño. En: http://www.ucc.edu.co/pasto/prensa/2014/Documents/1Resumen_Proyecto_L%C3%ADneas%20Arveja.pdf.;consulta:noviembre, 2014.
  2. Cruz, C. 2001. Programa GENES. Aplicativo computacional em genética e estadística.Editora UFV, Viϛosa MG.642p.
  3. Dane, 2011. Encuesta nacional agropecuaria. En http://apps.who.int/fctc/reporting/Checa et al. -party_reports/colombia_annex7_national_agricultural_survey.pdf.consulta : abril,2016.
  4. Falloon, R., Viljanen-Rollinson, S., Coles, G. and Poff, J. 1995. Disease severity keys for powdery and downy mildews of pea, and powdery scab of potato, New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science 23(1): 31-37
  5. Giaconi, V. 2004. Cultivo de hortalizas. 15 ed. Santiago de Chile: Editorial Uversitaria. 120 p.
  6. Goldenberg, J. 1965. “Afia” a new mutation in pea (Pisum sativum L.). Boletín Genética1: 27-28.
  7. Gotschalk, w. 1964. Die wirkung mutierter gene auf di Morphologie und Funkcion pflnzlicher Organe, Botanische Studien.
  8. Gonzáles, M. 2001. Interacción genotipo x ambiente en guisante proteaginoso (Pisum sativum L.). Tesis doctoral. Universidad de Valladolid: Departamento de Producción Vegetal y Silvopascicultura. 272 p.
  9. Hedley, C. and Ambrose, M. 1981. Designing “leaflss” plants for improving the dried pea crop. Advances in Agronomy. 34:225 - 227.
  10. Instituto Técnico y de Gestión Agrícola de Navarra (ITGA). 2003. Guisante proteaginoso en Navarra, campaña 2003- 2004.12 p.
  11. Khan, T., Ramzan, G., Jillani, G. and Mehmood, T. 2013. Morphological performance of peas (Pisum sativum L.) genotypes under rainfed conditions of Potowar region. Journal of Agricutural Research. 51:51- 60.
  12. Kujala, V. 1953. Felderbse, beiwelcher die ganzBlattspreite in Ranken umgewandelt ist. Archivum.100 Societatis Zoologica e Botanica e Fennicae “Vanamo” 8:44 - 45.
  13. Ligarreto, M., Gustavo, A., Ospina, H. y Andrés, R. 2009. Análisis de parámetros heredables asociados al rendimiento y precocidad en arveja voluble (Pisum sativum L.) tipo Santa Isabel. Agronomía Colombiana 27(3):333 - 339.
  14. Marx, G. A. and Mishanec, W. 1962. Inheritance of ovule number in Pisum sativum. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 80: 462-467.
  15. Marx, G. and Mishanec, W. 1967. Further studies on the inheritance of ovule number in Pisum. Crop Science 3:236- 239.
  16. Marx, G. 1987. A suite of mutants that modify pattern formation in pea leaves. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 5:311 - 335.
  17. Pantoja D., Muñoz K. y Checa O. 2014. Evaluación y correlación de componentes de rendimiento en líneas avanzadas de arveja Pisum sativum con gen afila. Revista de Ciencias Agrícolas 31 (2): 24- 39.
  18. Mera, M., Levío, J., Alcalde, J., Morales, M. y Galdames, R. 1996. Brisca-INIA, primera variedad de arveja áfia obtenida en Chile. Agricultura Técnica (Chile) 56 (4):282 - 286.
  19. Mihailovic, V. 2008. Componentes de rendimiento de grano afia (af) líneas de guisantes forrajeros (Pisum sativum L.). Instituto de Cultivos y Hortalizas, NoviSad, Serbia. 98 p.
  20. Ondrej, M., Dostalová, R., Hybl, M., Odstrcilová, L., Tyller, R. and Trojan, R. 2003. Utilization of afia types of pea (Pisum sativum L.) resistant to powdery mildew (Erysiphe pisi DC.) in the breeding programs. Plant Soil Environ. 49 (11): 481-485
  21. Prohens, J. and Nuez, T. 2007. Vegetables II: Liliaceae, Solanaceae, and melliferae. Springer Science and Bussines Media. Handbook of plant breeding. Springer. New York. 365 p.
  22. Sañudo, B., Checa, O. y Arteaga, G.1999. Manejo agronómico de leguminosas en zonas cerealistas. Universidad de Nariño, Facultad de Ciencias Agrícolas. Colombia, Pasto. p49- 65.
  23. Singh, M., Hari, D. and Bisth, S. 2013. Genetic and genomic resources of grain legume improvement. First edition. ELSEVIER INSIGHTS. London. 322 p.
  24. Tamayo, J. 2000. Enfermedades del cultivo de la arveja en Colombia: Guía de reconocimiento y control. Boletín técnico. Fondo Nacional de Leguminosas. Bogotá, Colombia. 50 p.
  25. Tiemerman, V., Mills, G., Frew, T., Butler, T., Mccallum, J., S., Murray, C., Whitfild, A., Rusell, A. and Wilson, D. 2004. Linkage mapping of QTLs for seed yield, yield components and developmental traits in pea (Pisum sativum L.). En: 4th International Crop Science Congress. Brisbane, Australia.
  26. Tulcán, G. y Castillo, C. 1998. Efecto de la labranza y aplicación de herbicidas en el manejo de malezas en el cultivo de arveja (Pisum Sativum L.) en el municipio de Pasto departamento de Nariño. Tesis Ingeniero Agrónomo. Universidad de Nariño: Facultad De Ciencias Agrícolas. Área Agronomía.
  27. Wang, F., Fu, J., Dong, L., and Zhu, Y. 2003. Tendril inheritance in semi-leaflss pea and its utilization in breeding. Yi chuan=Hereditas/Zhongguo yi chuan xue huibian ji, 25(2), 185-188.
Tutorials

Autors:

How send article?

Evaluator pair

How to evaluate an article?

Perfil de Google Scholar

Most read in the last 30 days

Keywords

QR code

Sistema OJS 3.4.0.3 - Metabiblioteca |