Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Diversity of the edaphic fauna of soils cultivated with coffee in southern Colombia

Diversidad de la edafofauna de suelos cafeteros del sur de Colombia



How to Cite
Lagos-Burbano, T. C., Ballesteros-Possu, W., & Delgado-Gualmatan, W. L. (2020). Diversity of the edaphic fauna of soils cultivated with coffee in southern Colombia. Sour Topics, 25(2), 117-128. https://doi.org/10.21897/rta.v25i2.2439

Dimensions
PlumX
Tulio Cesar Lagos-Burbano
William Ballesteros-Possu
Wilmer Libey Delgado-Gualmatan

The edaphic fauna is a biological indicator of soil fertility. Knowing its diversity allows establishing functional relationships with it and making decisions to establish conservation practices. The objective of this work was to evaluate the richness (Ri), relative abundance (AR), and diversity of the edaphic fauna in four municipalities of the department of Nariño, La Union, Sandona, Consaca y La Florida. The samplings were carried out at three altitudes, which were considered as replicates. In secondary forests and coffee crops, Ri and AR were recorded in mulch, between 10 and 20 cm, and between 20 and 30 cm deep. In Consacá, were registered 19,836 individuals of 24 orders, of which 37.6% corresponded to forest and 62.4% to coffee. Florida showed 13,980 individuals from 16 orders of which 41.3% were located in the forest and 58.7% in coffee. In La Unión, were found 6,935 individuals in 17 orders, where 64.2% were located in the forest and 35.8% in coffee. The number of individuals in Sandoná was 10,436, of which 10.7% were located in the forest and 89.3% in coffee. In forests, there were higher values of diversity than in coffee crops. The systems x depths interaction was not significant, an exception of the Shannon-Weaver and Simpson indices in Sandoná. Hymenoptera, Acari and Coleóptera were the most prevalent with differences in Ri and AR between forest and coffee.


Article visits 889 | PDF visits


Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Aquino, R., Tuesta, C. y Rengifo, E. 2012. Diversidad de mamíferos y sus preferencias por los tipos de hábitats en la cuenca del río Alto Itaya, Amazonía peruana. Rev. Peru. Biol. 19(1): 035-042.
  2. Anderson, J.M. and Ingram, J.S. 1994. Tropical soil biology and fertility: a handbook of methods. CAB International, Wallinford, UK. 238p. Doi: 10.2307/2261129
  3. Amazonas, N.T., Viani, R.A., Rego, M.G., Camargo, F.F. Fujihara, R.T. and Valsechi, O.A. 2018. Soil macrofauna density and diversity across a chronosequence of tropical forest restoration in Southeastern Brazil. Braz. J. Biol. 78(3): 449-456. Doi: 10.1590/1519-6984.169014
  4. Brussaard, L. 2012. Ecosystem services provided by the soil biota. pp. 45-58. En: Wall, D. y Bardgett, R. (Eds.). Soil Ecology and Ecosystem Services. Oxford University Press. Reino Unido. 406 p
  5. Cabrera-Mireles, H., Murillo-Cuevas, H.F., Adame-García, J. y Fernández-Viveros, J.A. 2019. Impacto del uso del suelo sobre la meso y macrofauna edáfica en caña de azúcar y pasto. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems. 22: 33-43. https://www.resear c hgate.net/ publication/333117700
  6. Carmona-Galindo, V.D. y Carmona, T.V. 2013. La diversidad de los análisis de diversidad. Bioma. 14: 20-28. https://www.resear c hgate.net/ publication/260192894
  7. Castellanos, L., González, A.F. y Capacho, A.E. 2019. Influencia de los sistemas agroforestales del proyecto Plantar sobre la macrofauna del suelo. Revista Bistua Facultad de Ciencias Básicas. 17(3):105- 116.
  8. Delgado, G., Burbano, A. y Silva, A. 2011. Evaluación de la macrofauna del suelo asociada a diferentes sistemas con café Coffea arabica L. Revista de Ciencias Agrícolas. 28(1): 91-106. Federación Nacional de Cafeteros de Colombia, Cenicafé - Agroclimatología División de Desarrollo Social, Santa Fe de Bogotá. 138p. https://biblioteca.cenicafe.org/ bitstream/10778/818/1/lib13731.pdf
  9. García, Y., Ramírez, W. y Sánchez, S. 2014. Efecto de diferentes usos de la tierra en la composición y la abundancia de la macrofauna edáfica, en la provincia de Matanzas. Pastos y Forrajes. 37(3): 313-321.
  10. García, A. y Bello, A. 2004. Diversidad de los organismos del suelo y transformaciones de la materia orgánica. I Conferencia Internacional eco-biología del suelo y el compost. SoilACE, León. pp211-212. https://www.uv.mx/personal/tcarmona/ files/2010/08/Garcia-y-Bello-2004.pdf
  11. Gómez, L., Caballero, A. y Baldión, J.V. 1991. Ecotopos cafeteros de Colombia. Federación Nacional de Cafeteros de Colombia, Cenicafé - Agroclimatología División de Desarrollo Social, Santa Fe de Bogotá. 138p.https://biblioteca.cenicafe.org/ bitstream/10778/818/1/lib13731.pdf
  12. Gizzi, A.H., Álvarez, H.A., Manetti, P.L., López, A.N., Clemente, N.L. y Studdert, G.A. 2009. Caracterización de la meso y macrofauna edáfica en sistemas de cultivo del sudeste bonaerense. CI. Suelo (Argentina). 27(1): 1-9. https://www.suelos.org.ar/publicaciones/ vol_27n1/Gizzi%20et%20al.pdf
  13. Jost, L. 2006. Entropy and diversity. Oikos. 113: 363–375.
  14. Karungi, J., Cherukut, S., Ijala, A. R., Tumuhairwe, J. B., Bonabana-Wabbi, J., Nuppenau, E. A., Otte, A. 2018. Elevation and cropping system as drivers of microclimate and abundance of soil macrofauna in coffee farmlands in mountainous ecologies. Applied Soil Ecology. Doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2018.08.003
  15. Lavelle, P. 2009. Ecology and the challenge of a multifunctional use of soil. Pesq. agropec. bras., Brasília. 44(8): 803-810. 10.1590/S0100-204X2009000800003
  16. Masin, C.E., Cruz, M.S., Rodríguez, A.R., Demonte, M.J., Vuizot, L.A., Maitre, M.I., Godoy, J.L. y Almada, M.S. 2017. Macrofauna edáfica asociada a diferentes ambientes de un vivero forestal (Santa Fe, Argentina). Ci. Suelo (Argentina) 35(1): 21-33. https://www.resear c hgate.net/ publication/320504719
  17. Pashanasi, B. 2001. Estudio cuantitativo de la macrofauna del suelo en diferentes sistemas de uso de la tierra en la Amazonia Peruana. Folia Amazónica. 12:75-97.
  18. Pardo-Locarno, L.C. 2009. macroinvertebrados edáficos en agroecosistemas del municipio de Cerrito (Valle), con énfasis en la comunidad de escarabajos Melolonthidae. Tesis Doctoral. Universidad del Valle, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Exactas, Programa de Biología. Santiago de Cali. 174p.
  19. Peredo, S.F., Parada, E., Vega, M. and Barrera, C.P. 2009. Edaphic mesofauna community structure in organic and conventional management of cranberry (Vaccinium sp.) plantations: an agroecological approach. Rev. Cienc. Suelo Nutr. / J. Soil. Sci. Plant Nutr. 9(3): 236-244.
  20. Rivas, C. and Schoereder, J. 2007. Ant communities, environmental characteristics and their implications for conservation in the Brazil Pantanal. Biodiversity and Conservation. 16: 1511-1520.
  21. Santos, J.B.D., Ramos, A.C., Azevedo, R., Oliveira L.C.I.D., Baretta, D., Cardoso, E.J.B.N. 2018. Macrofauna do solo em plantações de café orgânico e convencional no Brasil. Biota Neotropica, 18(2), e20180515.
  22. Somarriba, E. 1999. Diversidad Shannon. Agroforesteria en las Américas. 6(23): 72-74.https://www.resear c hgate.net/ publication/324164467
  23. Socarrás, A. 2013. Mesofauna edáfica: indicador biológico de la calidad del suelo. Pastos y Forrajes. 36 (1): 5-13.
  24. Socarrás-Rivero, A.A. 2018. Diversidad de la mesofauna edáfica en tres usos del suelo en la provincia Mayabeque, Cuba. Pastos y Forrajes. 41(2): 123-130.
  25. Steel, R.G. and Torrie, J.H. 1960. Principles and procedures of statistics. McGraw- Hil1, New York. 481p.
  26. Suárez, L., Rodríguez Pinto, S, Cuarán, and Salazar, J.C. 2019. Soil Macrofauna and Edaphic Properties in Coffee Production Systems in Southern Colombia. Floresta e Ambiente, 26(3), p1-8. Doi: 10.1590/2179-8087.033418
  27. Zerbino, M.S. 2010. Evaluación de la macrofauna del suelo en rotaciones cultivos-pasturas con laboreo convencional. Acta Zool. Mex. 26(2): 189-202.

Sistema OJS 3.4.0.3 - Metabiblioteca |